top of page

Moving your training online in 2026: what actually works (and what to avoid)

  • keziabeautyman5
  • 2 days ago
  • 3 min read
A person with curly hair types at a desk, viewing "Your Courses" on a monitor. The setting is an office with plants and various desk items.

Lots of organisations are now realising post-pandemic, and in this digital world with remote teams, they absolutely have to bring their training online, and the situation that follows is usually pretty similar. They’ve already got good material. Workshops, slide decks, and internal sessions that have built up over time. The value is there, it’s just not in a format that’s easy to roll out across remote teams.


So moving it online feels like the obvious next step. And it is. But what catches people off guard is that getting it onto a platform isn’t really the challenge anymore. Most tools will let you upload content quickly enough. The issue is what that content looks and feels like once it’s there, and whether anyone can easily work through it.


Where organisations struggle with moving training online


A lot of the time, the first version ends up being a direct lift. Slides get uploaded as they are, maybe turned into a longer page or a recorded session. It technically works, but it doesn’t feel like something built for that space. It feels like something that’s been moved rather than designed.


Accessibility is usually where things start to get missed. The focus is on getting content online quickly, rather than thinking about how people will actually use it. Slides are uploaded without alt text, layouts don’t work properly with screen readers, and navigation can be difficult to follow.


At the same time, people are being asked to get used to a new platform without much structure around it. For some, that’s just frustrating. For neurodivergent colleagues, especially, being presented with a lot of unstructured information can feel overwhelming and difficult to process. When that happens, it’s not unusual for concerns to be raised formally.


For everyone else, the pattern is a bit quieter but just as important. People log in, have a look, and don’t get very far. Or they complete it, but nothing really sticks.

It becomes a tick-box exercise.


What tends to work better


What we’ve seen work better is when people take a step back and rethink the structure slightly. Not the content itself, just how it’s experienced.


Breaking things up helps more than most expect. When someone can see a clear path through something, even if the total amount of content is the same, it feels lighter and more manageable. They’re more likely to keep going because it doesn’t feel like a big block they have to commit to all at once.


It also helps when there’s a bit of variety in how things are presented. Nothing over the top, just enough that it doesn’t feel repetitive. Some people prefer to read, others would rather watch or listen, and most switch between the two depending on the day. When everything is delivered in one format, you lose people without really noticing.


Accessibility plays into this more than people expect as well. It’s often treated as something separate, or something to deal with later, but in reality, it’s tied closely to whether people stay engaged. If something is easier to follow, easier to read, and not overwhelming, more people get through it. That includes people who wouldn’t necessarily describe themselves as needing adjustments.


Starting without overcomplicating it


One thing we always say to teams starting this process is not to try to move everything at once. It sounds efficient, but it usually slows things down.


Starting with one course tends to work better. Pick something that’s used often, reshape it slightly so it fits an online format, and see how it lands. You’ll learn more from that than trying to build ten courses in one go.


Where Neve comes in


Most of the organisations we support are in that exact position. They’re not starting from scratch; they just need help turning what they already have into something that works properly online.


That might mean rethinking the flow, mixing formats a bit, or just making sure it’s clear and easy to move through.


That’s really what Neve was built around. Not forcing everything into one way of learning, but giving people a way to shape training so it works for different people without adding loads of complexity.


Once you get that balance right, the shift online starts to feel less like a big project and more like a natural extension of what you’re already doing.


If you’re in the middle of bringing your training online and want to see how this could work for your team, book a demo with us, and we’ll walk you through it.



Comments


bottom of page